Pages

Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Apple, Google, Amazon, smartphone makers sign privacy accord

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Six of the world's top consumer technology firms have agreed to provide greater privacy disclosures before users download applications in order to protect the personal data of millions of consumers, California's attorney general said on Wednesday.

The agreement binds Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Research In Motion, and Hewlett-Packard -- and developers on their platforms -- to disclose how they use private data before an app may be downloaded, Attorney General Kamala D. Harris said.

"Your personal privacy should not be the cost of using mobile apps, but all too often it is," said Harris.

Currently 22 of the 30 most downloaded apps do not have privacy notices, said Harris. Some downloaded apps also download a consumer's contact book.

Google said in a statement that under the California agreement, Android users will have "even more ways to make informed decisions when it comes to their privacy."

Apple confirmed the agreement but did not elaborate.

Harris was also among U.S. state lawmakers who on Wednesday signed a letter to Google CEO Larry Page to express "serious concerns" over the web giant's recent decision to consolidate its privacy policy.

The policy change would give Google access to user information across its products, such as GMail and Google Plus, without the proper ability for consumers to opt out, said the 36 U.S. attorneys general in their letter.

EU authorities have asked Google to halt the policy change until regulators can investigate the matter.

CAN AND WILL SUE

California's 2004 Online Privacy Protection Act requires privacy disclosures, but Harris said few mobile developers had paid attention to the law in recent years because of confusion over whether it applied to mobile apps.

"Most mobile apps make no effort to inform users about how personal information is used," Harris said at a press conference in San Francisco. "The consumer should be informed of what they are giving up."

The six companies will meet the attorney general in six months to assess compliance among their developers. But Harris acknowledged "there is no clear timeline" to begin enforcement.

The attorney general repeatedly raised the possibility of litigation at some future time under California's unfair competition and false advertising laws if developers continue to publish apps without privacy notices.

"We can sue and we will sue," she said, adding that she hoped the industry would act "in good faith."

There are nearly 600,000 applications for sale in the Apple App Store and 400,000 for sale in Google's Android Market, and consumers have downloaded more than 35 billion, said Harris.

There are also more than 50,000 individual developers who have created the mobile apps currently available for download on the leading platforms, she said.

These figures are expected to grow. She said an estimated 98 billion mobile applications will be downloaded by 2015, and the $6.8 billion market for mobile applications is expected to grow to $25 billion within four years.

(Reporting By Gerry Shih; Editing by Carol Bishopric and Michael Perry)

Bail rules prevent Kim Dotcom from using Internet

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom made his fortune and even took his name from the Internet, but now he's barred from logging on.

Dotcom, accused by U.S. authorities of facilitating millions of illegal downloads through the file-sharing website, has been ordered not to access the Internet as part of his bail conditions. Another unusual condition: No helicopters can land at his home.

Dotcom was arrested in New Zealand in a high-profile raid Jan. 20 and was released Wednesday. New Zealand court authorities disclosed his bail conditions Thursday after The Associated Press and other media requested the information.

Under the terms of his release, Dotcom may leave his Auckland home only for approved outings such as court appearances and medical appointments. He is banned from contacting three Megaupload colleagues who were also arrested during the New Zealand raid and have also been released on bail pending extradition proceedings.

U.S. authorities have charged Dotcom with racketeering. They say he and his colleagues cheated movie makers and songwriters out of half a billion dollars in copyright revenue while making a fortune for themselves.

Dotcom did not have to post any monetary bond for his bail, a standard policy for New Zealand's district courts. He has an extradition hearing scheduled for August.

Dotcom was born Kim Schmitz in Germany but legally changed his name.

HP slips on concerns of delay in turnaround

(Reuters) - Shares of Hewlett-Packard Co fell more than 7 percent Thursday, after the world's No. 1 computer maker posted a sharp decline in quarterly earnings and warned it would take several years to turn around its sprawling businesses.

Chief Executive Meg Whitman, who took over the top job in September after the company fired Leo Apothekar, requested investors to keep their patience and said a turnaround the size the company was efforting took considerable time.

J.P. Morgan Securities, however, said secular, macro and company-related risk may delay an appreciable turnaround.

RBC Capital said investors may look past the choppy revenue performance, given the temporary difficulty in procuring hard-disk drives, but added that it expects problems to continue into the second quarter.

On Wednesday, HP, which has been trying to pick itself up from the mess the company found itself last year, reported a decline in sales in three of its key units: personal computers, printers and enterprise equipment.

"Revenue shortfall in PCs and significant quarter-on-quarter margin deterioration in every business raise questions about the competitiveness, cost structure and secular pressures in HP's business segments," Morgan Stanley said in a note to analysts.

Wall Street analysts fear that the multiple pressures that weighed on margins -- including yen strength, competitive hardware pricing and the ongoing HP Services restructuring -- are more than "one-quarter issues," and could continue into coming quarters.

Earlier this week, Dell Inc, the world's No. 3 personal computer maker, also posted fiscal fourth-quarter earnings below analysts' expectations and forecast fiscal first-quarter revenue below estimates, stoking fears the PC industry has not fully emerged from its downturn.

"While Dell did not have a particularly good January earnings call and in our opinion left a great deal of ambiguity in terms of the forces that impacted the January quarter, we believe HP's report, by comparison, was worse," said BMO Capital Markets' analyst Keith Bachman.

Bachman cut his price target on HP's stock to $33 from $35.

Of the 34 analysts covering HP, 18 rate it at "hold," five at "sell," six at "strong buy," and five at "buy," with a mean price target of $30.40, according to Thomson Reuters' StarMine data.

Shares of HP fell to $26.85 in Thursday morning trade. The stock has lost over 40 percent of its value since its 2011 high of $49.38.

Salesforce's 4Q, outlook lifts stock 10 percent

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — With each passing quarter, Salesforce.com Inc. is proving its once-unorthodox method of providing business software applications over the Internet is becoming a corporate craze.

The latest evidence came late Thursday with the release of Salesforce.com's fourth-quarter performance and initial forecast for this year. The numbers were highlighted by the kind of rapid revenue growth that investors love, lifting the already high-flying stock by nearly 10 percent. If that gain carries over into Friday's regular trading, Salesforce.com will boast a market value of about $20 billion — not bad for a company that was widely mocked when it started in 1999.

Back then, CEO Marc Benioff was among the few evangelists for the notion of selling software as a leasing service that collected a monthly fee from customers who could use applications on any device with an Internet connection. The idea represented a radical change from the more traditional — and expensive — approach of licensing and installing software on computers kept in the corporate customers' own offices.

Gradually, though, companies have become more comfortable with allowing their software needs to be stored on remote servers. The main reason: They have realized it saves money, is more convenient and makes it easier to upgrade to new technology. To adapt, older business software makers such as Oracle Corp. and SAP AG have recently been spending billions to acquire smaller rivals that specialize in selling software as a service.

The concept is becoming so popular that the geeky term used to describe it, "cloud computing," is moving into the mainstream.

Apple Inc., the trend-setting maker of the iPod, iPhone and iPod, jumped on the bandwagon last year with a service called "iCloud" that stores consumer files in its data centers. Internet search leader Google Inc. is widely expected to introduce a similar remote-storage service later this year.

Salesforce.com won more business converts during its fiscal fourth quarter — a span running from November through January.

The company, which is based in San Francisco, sustained a loss of $4.1 million, or 3 cents per share, in the period. That contrasted with earnings of $10.9 million, or 8 cents per share, at the same time last year. Dramatically higher expenses for employee stock compensation dragged down Salesforce in the latest quarter. The difference primarily stemmed from the hiring of nearly 2,500 workers during the past year.

If not for the employee stock compensation and several other accounting items, Salesforce said it would have earned 43 cents per share. That figure was 3 cents above the average estimate among analysts polled by FactSet.

More importantly to Wall Street, Salesforce's revenue growth accelerated during the quarter. The company's revenue totaled, $632 million, up 38 percent from the prior year. That was better than the 36 percent year-over-year revenue increase in the fiscal third quarter. The revenue for the most recent quarter also exceeded the average analyst projection of $624 million.

Salesforce's outlook for its current quarter ending in April calls for revenue of $673 million to $678 million. Analysts had been expecting $664 million. The company foresees adjusted earnings per share of 33 cent or 34 cents, below the average analyst forecast of 36 cents, according to FactSet.

Salesforce shares surged $12.88 to $144.65 in extended trading.

WikiLeaks suspect Manning defers plea, court-martial begins

FORT MEADE, Maryland (Reuters) - U.S. Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, accused of the largest leak of classified documents in U.S. history, deferred a plea in a military court arraignment on Thursday, marking the first step in a court-martial that could land him in prison for life.

In Thursday's procedure, Manning, 24, was formally charged with 22 counts including aiding the enemy, wrongfully causing intelligence to be published on the Internet and theft of public property. Military prosecutors say Manning downloaded more than 700,000 classified or confidential documents and transferred thousands to WikiLeaks, which promotes leaking government and corporate information.

Manning's plea deferral allows his defense team time to strategize and see the outcome of several motions to be heard before the trial begins, which could be as late as August.

"It basically leaves their options open," said a legal expert with the Military District of Washington, the Army command unit for the capital region, who was present at the arraignment. The expert could not be named under rules imposed on media covering the proceedings.

When asked if he understood his rights to counsel, Manning, in a dark green military dress uniform and black-rimmed military glasses, spoke quickly but forcefully. "Yes, your honor," he said.

Manning's attorney, David Coombs, announced that Manning would defer his plea as well as a decision on whether to face trial by a military judge or a panel of military members, made up of senior officers or enlisted members of rank no lower than Manning's.

At the beginning of the arraignment, Manning entered from a back door and walked briskly to the front of the room. During the proceedings, he leaned forward on to a desk, occasionally conferring in whispers with Coombs.

Military prosecutors say Manning, trained on various intelligence systems, was a trusted analyst who knowingly and methodically downloaded thousands of files from the military's Secret Internet Protocol Router Network, or SIPRNet, while serving in Iraq.

They sought to link Manning to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, introducing logs of web chats that an investigator said appeared to show conversations in which the two discuss sending government documents.

Manning's lawyers have cast him as an emotionally troubled young man whose behavioral problems should have prompted superiors to revoke his access to classified information.

Manning has gained a following of supporters who see him as a whistleblower who acted on behalf of his country. At the end of the arraignment one Manning supporter, a protester with the anti-war group Code Pink, stood up and yelled out, "Judge, isn't a soldier required to report a war crime?"

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

Summary Box: Obama admin seeks privacy rules

THE VISION: The Obama administration is calling for stronger privacy protections for consumers who use the Internet, mobile phones and other technologies.

THE DETAILS: Technology companies, consumer groups and others will now convene to jointly craft new protections. Such guidelines will initially be voluntary for companies, but those that agree to abide by them could be subject to sanctions for any violations.

THE REACTION: Consumer and privacy groups welcomed the effort, though some worried that it won't do enough. Legislation would be needed to require all companies to follow such guidelines.

Magazine publishers going for slice of e-commerce pie

NEW YORK (TheWrap.com) - The line between publisher and retailer is blurring as companies partner up to try and capture more of the e-commerce pie.

Hearst and People magazine have both recently signed deals targeting online shoppers: Hearst aligned with Amazon, and People with Gilt Groupe on a sale inspired by Oscar fashions.

Pam Horan, president of the Online Publishers Association, said that at its recent Annual Summit there was much discussion of the Amazon deal and other e-commerce proposals.

"Consumers are buying more and more stuff online, so there is an opportunity for publishers to provide this comprehensive experience," Horan told TheWrap.

But some question how these partnerships will affect editorial independence. Horan said a renewed look at e-commerce is likely in 2012.

In its deal, Hearst will make in-magazine purchases much easier, providing links to Amazon in the tablet editions of many of its magazines.

People magazine, a Time Inc. title, chose to partner with the Gilt Groupe for its own brand of e-commerce. Its partnership is content only, as some of People.com's editors will curate the items available for Gilt's special Oscars sale. The clothing available is supposed to be inspired by the Oscar red carpet.

Hearst and Time are not the first companies to pursue this new revenue stream, nor will they be the last.

According to ComScore's "Mobile Future in Focus" report released Thursday, mobile devices are the new go-to gadgets for online shopping, browsing and bidding.

More than half of Americans that own smartphones used them to perform retail-related activities while in stores last year. In December, at the height of the holiday shopping period, 28.5 million mobile users accessed online retail content; that's an 87 percent increase over December of 2010.

"The rise of mobile retail has become both an on-screen and in-store phenomenon," the report said. "The retail industry, which already experienced an upheaval with the advent of online shopping, is poised for further disruption as smartphones enter brick-and-mortar stores."

That phenomenon is likely to spread to tablets as well, since the market for those devices is growing even faster than the one for smartphones did.

"In less than two years, nearly 40 million tablets were in use among mobile subscribers in the U.S., outpacing smartphones which took 7 years to achieve the same level of adoption," the study noted.

As the ComScore study notes, consumers are doing research or buying content on their phones and tablets, "Publishers are trying to reduce any kind of friction preventing consumer access to these products."

John Loughlin, general manager of Hearst Magazines, told Adweek's Lucia Moses that there's no editorial interference. Ruth Reichl, the former editor of Gourmet and now the editorial director of the Gilt Groupe's Gilt Taste, contends that there's no conflict of interest if you're vigilant about it.

"More and more you are seeing the blending of commerce and content," Reichl told TheWrap last year. "Where it becomes a conflict is if you're hedging your bets and someone comes in and offers you a lot of money to sell things. Suddenly you're selling things you really don't like."

(Editing By Zorianna Kit)

Ex-McAfee execs start security firm, CrowdStrike

BOSTON (Reuters) - Two executives who left security software maker McAfee after Intel Corp bought the company last year have started a firm that is developing technology to help corporations and government agencies track down elusive hackers.

Private equity firm Warburg Pincus led the initial Series A funding in the company, dubbed CrowdStrike.

The new company's chief executive, George Kurtz, announced the formation of the company on his blog, www.georgekurtz.com.

Kurtz, the former worldwide chief technology offer of McAfee, has been working with Warburg on the project since November, when the private equity firm brought him on as a "executive in residence."

Warburg's executive in residence program is a CEO-in-waiting position in which the private equity firm helps entrepreneurs incubate ideas into companies in which it will eventually invest.

CrowdStrike's other co-founders are Dmitri Alperovitch, former vice president of threat research at McAfee, and Gregg Marston, who worked as chief financial officer of Foundstone Inc, an IT security solutions provider that Kurtz sold to McAfee.

Kurtz said in his blog that his firm is developing technology that will help clients identify who is targeting them, rather than simply identify and remove pieces of malicious software from their networks.

"The industry continues to focus on the malware ... which is akin to focusing on the gun as opposed to the shooter committing the crime," he said. "The person or organization pulling the trigger (or deploying the malware) is the one that you ultimately need to focus on."

Alperovitch told Reuters that the company hopes to release its first products in late 2012.

(Reporting By Jim Finkle; Editing by Gary Hill)

Obama administration seeks online privacy rules

NEW YORK (AP) — The Obama administration is calling for stronger privacy protections for consumers as mobile gadgets, Internet services and other tools are able to do a better job of tracking what you do and where you go.

Consumer and privacy groups welcomed the effort, though some worried that it won't do enough.

Administration officials outlined a proposed "Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights" on Thursday and urged technology companies, consumer groups and others to jointly craft new protections. Such guidelines will initially be voluntary for companies, but those that agree to abide by them could be subject to sanctions for any violations.

"As the Internet evolves, consumer trust is essential for the continued growth of the digital economy," President Barack Obama said in a statement. "That's why an online privacy Bill of Rights is so important. For businesses to succeed online, consumers must feel secure."

The effort comes as companies have found more sophisticated ways to collect and combine data on your interests and habits. Beginning next week, for instance, Google will start merging data it collects from email, video, social-networking and other services when you're signed in with a Google account.

The growing use of smartphones and tablet computers adds another dimension to the tracking. Location information can give service providers such as Facebook insights into where you spend your time and, if you have friends who use the same services, whom you tend to hang out with in person.

Data collection can help companies improve and personalize services. It can also help advertisers fine-tune messages and reach the people most likely to buy their products and services, often without consumers even realizing it.

That is why the administration is seeking more data protections for consumers in a report issued Thursday.

How strong the protections will be ultimately depends on what rules the different parties involved can agree on. Because legislation to enable traditional regulation would take time, the administration favored an approach that combined input from private companies, advocacy groups, regulators and other parties.

Consumer Watchdog, a nonprofit research and advocacy group in California, said the approach will work only if influential companies don't water down the rules to render them meaningless.

"I am skeptical about the 'multi-stakeholder process,' but am willing to make a good-faith effort to try," said John M. Simpson, the group's privacy project director. He's referring to the various parties with competing interests tasked with making the rules.

Last week, the Federal Trade Commission complained that software companies producing games and other mobile applications aren't telling parents what personal information is being collected from kids and how companies are using it. Depending on how the guidelines are crafted, companies could be required to more prominently disclose when they collect such things as location, call logs and lists of friends — not just from kids, but everyone.

The report is not intended to replace other efforts at offering privacy protections.

Apple, Google, Microsoft and other leading companies in mobile computing agreed Wednesday to require that mobile applications seeking to collect personal information warn users before their services are installed. The guidelines came as part of an agreement with California's attorney general.

Separately, the FTC has recommended the creation of a "Do Not Track" tool to let consumers curb advertisers from studying their online activity to target ads. On Thursday, an alliance representing Google, Yahoo, AOL and other leading ad-delivery companies committed to adopting the Do Not Track technology when it is built into Web browsers, something expected this year. The FTC could punish violators.

Commerce Secretary John Bryson said in a briefing with reporters that the administration's proposal not only protects consumers but also gives businesses better guidance on how to meet consumer expectations.

The proposal expands on widely accepted Fair Information Practice Principles crafted in the 1970s, when the Internet was just an experimental network used primarily by researchers. Those existing guidelines say that consumers should be informed about any data collection and given the option to refuse. They should also be allowed to review and correct data about themselves. The principles have provisions for security and enforcement.

Applying the principles to the Internet era, the administration said data collected in one context should not be used for another, while companies should specify any plans for deleting data or sharing information with outside parties, such as advertisers. Companies also need to be mindful of the age and sophistication of consumers. Disclosures need to be presented when and where they are most useful for consumers.

The idea isn't to give people access to everything a company collects about them, but they should at least be able to review and correct any information that is used to make decisions.

The Commerce Department's National Telecommunications and Information Administration plans to convene companies, privacy advocates, regulators and other parties in the coming months to craft detailed guidelines that reflect those principles. Enforcement will be left to the FTC under existing laws.

The codes of conduct will be specific to particular types of companies. One might cover social networks, for instance, while another might deal with services on mobile gadgets. A company that offers social-networking features on phones might adopt both. New ones could emerge as technology evolves.

Although officials expect many companies will agree to the new codes, allowing them to use that commitment in marketing materials, the report also called on Congress to pass new laws to require remaining companies to adopt such guidelines. Until then, enforcement will be limited to companies that say they would abide by the codes but fail to do so.

The Center for Democracy and Technology, a Washington group that advocates stronger privacy protections, welcomed the voluntary codes as an interim measure, but said legislation ultimately will be needed to fully protect consumers.

Legislation also will be needed for the FTC to give protections to businesses that follow a checklist of good practices. Known as safe harbor, such protections would exempt companies from sanctions if they inadvertently break a code.

The report comes 14 months after the Commerce Department first proposed a privacy bill of rights. The issue was later elevated to the White House and won its endorsement with the release of Thursday's report.

The administration dropped a proposal in the original report to create a federal privacy office within the Commerce Department. Instead, the task of convening parties to craft guidelines is left to the existing National Telecommunications and Information Administration.

___

Online:

http://1.usa.gov/zp645t

White House unveils 'one click' online privacy plan

The White House unveiled an online privacy proposal Thursday intended to allow Web users to easily opt out of being tracked on the Internet.

The "Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights" has received the backing of leading Internet companies and online advertising networks and would involve a simple "one click" setting on a Web browser, the White House said.

"American consumers can't wait any longer for clear rules of the road that ensure their personal information is safe online," President Barack Obama said in a statement.

"As the Internet evolves, consumer trust is essential for the continued growth of the digital economy.

"That's why an online privacy Bill of Rights is so important," Obama said. "For businesses to succeed online, consumers must feel secure.

"By following this blueprint, companies, consumer advocates and policymakers can help protect consumers and ensure the Internet remains a platform for innovation and economic growth," he said.

The White House said Internet firms and ad networks were committing to incorporate "Do Not Track" technology in most major Web browsers to make it easier for users to control online tracking.

"Companies that represent the delivery of nearly 90 percent of online behavioral advertisements, including Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, and AOL have agreed to comply when consumers choose to control online tracking," it said.

The Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights comes on the heels of a number of privacy controversies involving some of the biggest actors on the Web, including Facebook and Google.

It has received the backing of the Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA), a consortium of Internet, media and marketing trade associations and companies.

"Consumers will have a simple and clear mechanism in their browser to exercise choice," DAA counsel Stuart Ingis said.

"If a consumer elects not to have data collected on them under the principles laid out then that will be honored uniformally across all companies."

Ingis said the DAA will work with browser providers "to develop consistent language across browsers regarding this technology to make choice simple and clear."

White House deputy chief technology officer Daniel Weitzner said the "Do Not Track" option would be a "very easy, one click" setting on a Web browser.

Federal Trade Commission chairman Jon Leibowitz said companies that make a commitment to "Do Not Track" would be subject to Federal Trade Commission enforcement.

"It's great to see that companies are stepping up to our challenge to protect privacy so consumers have greater choice and control over how they are tracked online," Leibowitz said.

"The fact that they're going to honor the Web browser's choice of what we call a 'Do Not Track' header is simply going to give consumers more privacy options and that is critically important," he said.

The White House said the Commerce Department will begin holding talks with companies, privacy and consumer advocates, academics and others to develop privacy policies and practices based on the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights.

"We will be working with Congress to implement this through legislation," Commerce Secretary John Bryson said. "But we're moving forward regardless."

The Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights calls for giving consumers control over what personal data organizations collect from them and how they use it, clear privacy practices and secure and responsible handling of their data.

Consumers should also have a right to access and correct personal data and be able to expect that any information they provide will be used in ways that are consistent with the context in which they provided the data.